HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8975 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard Sri Bal Krishna Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and Sri Durgesh Kumar Pathak and Ganesh Kumar Verma, learned counsel who have filed Caveat on behalf of opposite party no. 4. 2. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that since due to an inadvertence certain defects have crept in, in the memo of petition and therefore, the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed and liberty be granted to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition after removing the defects. 3. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty, September 26, 2025 Fahim/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bal Krishna Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Durgesh Kumar Pathak (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Dharamraj Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAHIM AKHTAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench