Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166042 (ALL)

SUDHIR KUMAR AGARWAL THRU. POWER OF ATTORNEY AYUSH AGARWAL v. BOARD OF REVENUE THRU. CHAIRMAN, LUCKNOW AND 24 OTHERS

A227/5722/2025 · 2025-09-22

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5722 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow to decide the revision No.1270 of 2021, Computerized Case No.R20211354001270, "Hari Om Gupta vs. Sudhir Kumar Agarwal and others", under Section 210 of U.P. Land Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow, considers and decides the aforesaid revision in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 / Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow is directed to decide the revision No.1270 of 2021, Computerized Case No.R20211354001270, "Hari Om Gupta vs. Sudhir Kumar Agarwal and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Verma, Arun Kumar Srivastava, Deepansi, Kuldeep Kumar Srivastava, Mangal Sen Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sudhir Kumar Agarwal Thru. Power Of Attorney Ayush Agarwal .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue Thru. Chairman, Lucknow And 24 Others .....Respondent(s) others", under Section 210 of U.P. Land Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 22, 2025 KR A227 No. 5722 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench