Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16603 (AP)

JANGALA CHELAMAYYA v. JAHANAVI IAS

CC/2766/2023 · 2025-04-10

Ninala Jayasurya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010220622023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2766/2023 Between: Jangala Chelamayya, S/o, Late Narayana Rao, Aged about 72 years, R/o.D.No.7-10-15, Nistalavari Street, Anakapalli, Visakahapatnam District and another ....Petitioners AND Jahanavi IAS, The joint collector-cum-Settlement Officer, Anakapalli District (Erstwhile Visakahapatnam District) ....Contemnor Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. P SUBASH The Court made the following: Heard Mr.V.V.N.Narayana Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr.Satish Sandu, learned counsel representing Mr.P.Subash, learned counsel for the contemnor. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners sought to impress upon the Court, that the conduct of the respondent in issuing the endorsement dated 19.07.2023 and not explaining the delay in implementing the orders passed in the Writ Petition, apart from passing an endorsement, without any cogent 2 reasons much less by examining the claim petition of the petitioners, would tantamount to disobedience of the orders of this Court. 3. He also submits that as the petitioners are awaiting orders in the contempt case, they had not taken steps for filing Writ Petition, and the same is being projected as if the petitioner is not diligent in pursing the remedies. Be that as it may. 4. In view of the undisputed fact that the said endorsement is subsequently challenged before this Court vide W.P.No.453 of 2021, this Court, keeping in view the said aspect into consideration and the limited scope in the contempt case, is not inclined to examine the matter in detail. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date: 10.04.2025 LSP 3 152 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2766/2023 Date: 10.04.2025 LSP