RAJENDRA KUMAR KATIYAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/11118/2025 · 2025-09-19
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166021 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166021 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11118 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main relief:
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to decide the 26.08.2025, petitioner's representation dated whereby to include and approve the name of the petitioner in absorbing his services for the grant of Selection Grade and ACP and by thereby granting consequential retirement benefits flowing therefrom including the arrear from the date of the grant of Selection Grade and ACP till the retirement of the petitioner."
3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 2- Director, Department of Backward Classes Welfare, Lucknow or any other competent authority, who shall consider and decide the same expeditiously within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order is served upon the concerned authority.
4. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition stands disposed of. (Manish Mathur,J.) September 19, 2025 AKK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Singh, Mansi Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Rajendra Kumar Katiyar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Backward Classes Welfare And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench