HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9272 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Brijesh Kumar Singh, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the informant. The Vakalatnama is taken on record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.49 of 2025, under Section 140(1), 70(1) 103(1), 238A, 66, 3(5) BNS, Police Station Kotwali Ayodhya, District Ayodhya. 3. Learned A.G.A. opposes the bail application by arguing that the order rejecting the bail was passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act and in terms of the provisions of the SC/ST Act, an appeal is prescribed. He further argues that this issue was considered by this Court in the case of Chandra Raj vs State of U.P.; MANU/UP/3182/2024 wherein a similar arguments was noticed by this Court and ultimately it was held that an appeal would lie against the order rejecting the bail by Special Judge, SC/ST Act. 4. Upholding the arguments of the learned A.G.A and following the judgment in the case of Chandra Raj (Supra), the present bail application is rejected. 5. The applicant would be at liberty to file an appeal under Section 14-A (2) of the SC/ST Act. 6. Office is directed to return the certified copy of the FIR and bail Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rehan Ahmad Siddiqui, Km. Priya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Hari Ram Kori .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) rejection order on moving an appropriate application by the Counsel for the applicant. October 9, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 9272 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench