Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166017 (MAD)

Dhanakumar v. The Superintendent of Police

WP(MD)/29628/2024 · 2025-04-16

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD) NO.29628 of 2024 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.04.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P(MD) No.29628 of 2024 Dhanakumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Subramaniyapuram, Land Grabbing Department, Trichy. 2.The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Sub-Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch-II, Trichy. 3.Muthaian 4.S.V.Balraj 5.P.Kathirvel 6.Karthikeyan 7.Anand 8.V.K.Marimuthu 9.The Sub-Registrar Woriur, Trichy-3 10.The Manager Indian Overseas Bank, _____________ Page No. 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD) NO.29628 of 2024 Cantonment Branch, Trichy. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent to conduct enquiry and to take necessary action as against the respondents on the petitioner’s representation dated 26.09.2024. For petitioner :Mr.R.Murugesan For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R4 : Mr.N.Mohan For R9 : Mr.Senthil Ayyanar, Government Advocate ***** O R D E R This petition is filed by the petitioner to direct the second respondent to conduct enquiry and to take necessary action based on the petitioner's representation dated 26.09.2024. 2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the representation of the petitioner is under consideration and the same is pending for enquiry and they will conduct _____________ Page No. 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD) NO.29628 of 2024 enquiry and dispose of the same within a period of 15 days. 3. Mr.N.Mohan, the learned counsel takes notice for the fourth respondent. Mr.Senthil Ayyanar, the learned Government Advocate takes notice for the ninth respondent. 4. Considering the prayer sought for in this petition, this Court, without issuing notice to the other respondents, is inclined to pass orders. 5. Since the representation of the petitioner is under consideration by the second respondent, this Court directs the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner and take appropriate action in accordance with law, after affording opportunity to both the parties within a period of 15 days from the date of this order. 6. With the abovesaid observations and directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 16.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd _____________ Page No. 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD) NO.29628 of 2024 To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Subramaniyapuram, Land Grabbing Department, Trichy. 2.The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Sub-Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch-II, Trichy. 3.The Sub-Registrar Woriur, Trichy-3 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. _____________ Page No. 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD) NO.29628 of 2024 P.DHANABAL,J apd W.P.(MD) No.29628 of 2024 16.04.2025 _____________ Page No. 5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis