HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11100 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed challenging transfer order dated 13.6.2025 whereby petitioner has been transferred from District Ghaziabad to Bareilly. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that the aforesaid transfer order is against clause 5(iii) of the Government order dated 6.5.2025 and therefore, petitioner has also preferred a representation which is still pending consideration. At present, learned counsel for petitioner has prayed for a final decision on representation. 4. Considering innocuous prayer being made by learned counsel for petitioner and without entering into merits of the case, petitioner is granted liberty to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 4- Additional Commissioner (Administration) State Tax U.P., Lucknow, who shall consider and decide the same within a period of four weeks from the date of its receipt to the concerned authority. 5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, petition stands disposed of. September 19, 2025 AKK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Shukla, Awantika Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ankit Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Tax And Registration Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench