Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166008 (ALL)

RAMENDRA PRASAD SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECRETARY HOME LKO.

A483/789/2025 · 2025-09-24

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 789 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Learned counsel for the applicant, at the very outset, submits that due to typographical error in the prayer clause date of charge sheet in place of "31.1.2018', "31.1.2025' has wrongly been transcribed. He prays that he may be permitted to correct the same during course of the day. 2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for the State does not dispute the aforesaid contention. 3. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to amend/correct the prayer clause as prayed during the course of the day. 4. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. 5. Instant application has been filed with the prayer to direct the trial court concerned to decide the proceedings relating to Criminal Case/Case Crime No. 296 of 2017 under Section 406 , 420 I.P.C., Police Station- Gola, District- Kheri in which F.I.R. was lodged on 24.6.2017 and charge sheet has been submitted before the trial court concerned on 31.1.2018, expeditiously within stipulated period of time. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the matter is pending since 2018. He thus submits that if the trial court is directed to conclude the proceedings of the aforementioned Criminal Case/Case Crime No. 296 of 2017 within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Adarsh Kumar Maurya, Alka Rani, Ambrish Kumar, Ram Krishna Verma, Shubham Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramendra Prasad Shukla .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secretary Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Learned A.G.A. for the State has no objection to the submissions aforesaid. 8. In view of the aforesaid submissions and innocuous prayer made in the application, the trial court is hereby directed to conclude the trial of aforementioned Criminal Case/Case Crime No. 296 of 2017, with expedition, if there is no legal impediment, in accordance with law. 9. With the aforesaid observations, instant application stands disposed of accordingly. September 24 , 2025 Anuj Singh A483 No. 789 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench