Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166002 (ALL)

SHAHZAD ALI @ BABLOO v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO.

/9034/2025 · 2025-09-23

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9034 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Sri Subodh Kumar Pandey, the learned counsel for the applicant states that it has come to light from the instructions provided to the learned A.G.A-I that the applicant is involved in another case, in which, he is yet to be released on bail, and, for this reason, he does not want to press the instant application at this stage and he will file an application for release on bail after his release on bail in that other case. 2. Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as not pressed. 3. Let the certified copies annexed with the application be returned to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining their photocopies of the same on record. September 23, 2025 Preeti Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Subodh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Shahzad Ali @ Babloo .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench