PAPPU ANSARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND 12 OTHERS
WRIC/9266/2025 · 2025-09-25
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166001 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166001 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9266 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner complaining that an order has been passed against the petitioner at the instance of the respondents.
3. Considering the fact that the order under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is appealable under Section 67(5) of the Code, the present petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to prefer an appeal, if so advised, in accordance with law.
4. The petitioner would also be entitled to move an interim application in the appeal that may be filed, which shall be disposed of within a period of one week from the same being filed. September 25, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajendra Prasad Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Pappu Ansari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And 12 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench