Kumar Ruban Doss Salamon v. The District Collector
WP(MD)/29401/2024 · 2025-01-28
K Kumaresh Babu
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165982 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165982 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.(MD) No.29401 of 2024 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.01.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU W.P.(MD) No.29401 of 2024 and W.M.P.(MD) No.24814 of 2024 Kumar Ruban Doss Salamon .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi. 2.The Regional Transport Officer, Sankarankovil Regional Transport Office, Sankarankovil, Tenkasi District. 3.The Motor Vehicle Inspector-Grade-I, Sankarankovil Regional Transport Office, Sankarankovil, Tenkasi District. 4.Santhanamariappan .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 3, by restraining this 4th respondent, as a service operator “New 5 Star Minibus Service”, plying the mini bus, by operating from Sankarankovil Bus Stand, ion violation of its permitted route, and to _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD) No.29401 of 2024 monitor and take appropriate action against him, for the violation, if he committed, within a time frame that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.F.X.Eugene For RR1 to 3 : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Additional Government Pleader For R4 : Mr.R.J.Karthik
ORDER The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking for a direction to take action against the fourth respondent from operating his mini bus in violation of the conditions, particularly the permitted route and to monitor the same.
2. When the matter was taken up today, the learned Additional Government Pleader, on instructions, would submit that not only the fourth respondent, the petitioner has also violated the permit conditions and fine has been imposed on both the petitioner and the fourth respondent as well. _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD) No.29401 of 2024
3. In view of the same, this Court is of the view that no further adjudication is required to be made in this writ petition. However, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to see that none of the vehicles including the petitioner and the fourth respondent operating within his jurisdiction does not violate the permit conditions, that has been appended to the permit.
4. With the aforesaid directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
28.01.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes abr To 1.The District Collector, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi. 2.The Regional Transport Officer, Sankarankovil Regional Transport Office, Sankarankovil, Tenkasi District. _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD) No.29401 of 2024 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. abr 3.The Motor Vehicle Inspector-Grade-I, Sankarankovil Regional Transport Office, Sankarankovil, Tenkasi District.
W.P.(MD) No.29401 of 2024 Dated: 28.01.2025 _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis