Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165975 (ALL)

BALRAM (PNO-830560138) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/11090/2025 · 2025-09-19

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11090 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "(a) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to re-fix pension of the petitioner and pay it to the petitioner accordingly in view of the fact that previous pay fixation order dated 17.01.2022 is not in existence and it has been quashed by this Hon'ble Court, vide order dated 24.10.2024, passed in Writ A No.8119 of 2023 (BalramVs. State of U.P. & others). (b) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay arrears of pension and difference amount of post retiral dues (if any) to the petitioner as per his pay re-fixation. (c) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the O.P. No.2/ Finance Controller, U.P. Police Headquarters, Lucknow to pass orders/ take decision in a stipulated time over the letter dated 26.07.2025, forwarded to him by the opposite party no.3/ Commandant, 25 BN, P.A.C., District Raebareli in respect of fixation of pay of the petitioner." 3. It has been submitted that the aforesaid representation has thereafter been forwarded to opposite party no.2 where it is still pending consideration. 4. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party No.2 i.e. Finance Controller, U.P. Police Headquarters, 3rd Floor, Tower-2, Police Bhawan, Signature Building, Shaheed Path, Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gyanendra Nath Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Balram (Pno-830560138) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 19, 2025 prabhat WRIA No. 11090 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench