Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165964 (ALL)

SMT. RAJESHWARI SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/5711/2025 · 2025-09-22

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5711 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no.1 and 2. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 / Tahsildar, Tahsil Sohawal, District Ayodhya to decide the Case 508 of 2016, (Computerized Case No.T2016042302508), under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, "Angad Singh and others vs. Viddya Devi, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 / Tahsildar, Tahsil Sohawal, District Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 / Tahsildar, Tahsil Sohawal, District Ayodhya is directed to decide the Case 508 of 2016, (Computerized Case No.T2016042302508), under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, "Angad Singh and others vs. Viddya Devi, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Chandra Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Rajeshwari Singh And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 22, 2025 KR A227 No. 5711 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench