RENU AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
/8031/2025 · 2025-09-23
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165962 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165962 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8031 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Sri Sudhir Kumar Rai,Advocate, has put in appearance by way of filing Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2 and the same is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Sudhir Kumar Rai, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No. 973/2022 State vs Raja Bajpai & others, pending before the Civil Judge Senior Division, F.T.C. Unnao, arising out of case crime number 221/2020 under Sections 419, 420, 406 of the Indian Penal Code 1860, Police Station-Asoha,District-Unnao, including the chargesheet dated 28.07.2021 and the cognizance and summoning order dated 30.10.2021 passed by the Learned Civil Judge Senior Division, F.T.C. Unnao.
Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the instant case. He next added that due to some misunderstanding, the instant F.I.R. has been lodged against the applicants and thereafter, the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise deed has been reduced in writing on 13-09-2025, which has been annexed as annexure no. 4 to the instant application. He next added that now there is no grievance in between the parties with each other and the criminal proceedings against the applicants are the futile exercise as there is no fate of trial and that is amount to harassment of the applicants and thus, the criminal proceedings against the applicants may be quashed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Devesh Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Sudhir Kumar Rai Renu And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 2 has supported the version of the learned counsel for the applicants and submits that the parties have settled their dispute amicably through a compromise deed and there is no further grievance of the opposite parties against the present applicants and the criminal proceedings against the applicants may be dropped. Learned A.G.A. appearing for the State has no objection to the
contentions aforesaid. Now whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the court below as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. For a period of three months, the criminal proceedings arising out of case crime number 221/2020 under Sections 419, 420, 406 of the Indian Penal Code 1860, Police Station-Asoha,District-Unnao, shall remain stayed so far as present applicants are concerned. The trial court is further directed for ensuring the fact that all the parties against whom the chargesheet was filed are present before the trial court and a report with respect to this effect shall also be sent alongwith verification order. Office is directed to return the copy of original compromise deed to
learned counsel for the applicants within a week. September 23, 2025 AKS A482 No. 8031 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench