M/S A R K FUEL STATION v. TUMKUR GRAIN MERCHANTS CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD.
WP/4334/2021 · 2025-01-20
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16595 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16595 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2222 WP No. 4334 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 4334 OF 2021 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
M/S A.R.K.FUEL STATION BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI RAHAMAN KHAN, S/O LATE ISMAIL KHAN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, NO.A, ABUL KALAM AZAD CIRCLE, (HIGHWAY CIRCLE), INDUSTRIAL AREA BANNI MANTAP, MYSURU-570 015. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.N.SURESHA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1.
TUMKUR GRAIN MERCHANT'S CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., B.H.ROAD, TUMKUR-572 103.
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER.
2.
MRS RESHMA BANU W/O REHMAN KHAN, R/AT 164/B, SOAP FACTORY ROAD, NEAR PUTHLI PARK ROAD, BANNIMANTAP EXTENSION, MYSORE-570 015.
3.
SRI RUMAN KHAN S/O RAHAMAN KHAN, R/AT 164/B, SOAP FACTORY ROAD,
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2222 WP No. 4334 of 2021
NEAR PUTHLI PARK ROAD, BANNIMANTAP EXTENSION, MYSORE-570 015.
4.
SRI ARBAZ KHAN S/O RAHAMAN KHAN, R/AT 164/B, SOAP FACTORY ROAD, NEAR PUTHLI PARK ROAD, BANNIMANTAP EXTENSION, MYSORE-570 015.
5.
SRI SALMAN KHAN S/O RAHAMAN KHAN, R/AT 164/B, SOAP FACTORY ROAD, NEAR PUTHLI PARK ROAD, BANNIMANTAP EXTENSION, MYSORE-570 015.
6.
MISS AFANA KHANUM M/G BY FATHER SRI RAHAMAN KHAN, R/AT 164/B, SOAP FACTORY ROAD, NEAR PUTHLI PARK ROAD, BANNIMANTAP EXTENSION, MYSORE-570 015.
7.
SRI SIRAJUDDIN S/O MIR AZMATHULLA NO.3281, 4TH CROSS, 2ND EDIGHI, C V ROAD, MANDI MOHALLA, BANNIMANTAP, MYSURU-570 015. …RESPONDENTS (R1 TO 7 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2222 WP No. 4334 of 2021
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the writ papers, the Petition is filed in the year 2021. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending from four years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 25