Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16595 (JHR)

DINESH YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5397/2025 · 2025-07-03

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:17821] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5397 of 2025 ------ Dinesh Yadav, aged 32 Years, S/O:- Dilchhu Yadav, R/o Village- Gosichak, P.O.:- Marpa, P.S.:- Balwadda, Dist:- Godda .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Vani Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 03-07-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection Mahagama P.S. Case No.13 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. No.439 of 2025 (T.R. No.1606 of 2025) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103 (1), 238, 324 (4), 324 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed murder of Ranjit Kumar Pandit. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-11 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of his own confessional statement and leading to discovery of one hammer. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 12.02.2025 as is evident from para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st class, Godda in connection with Mahagama P.S. Case No.13 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. No.439 of 2025 (T.R. No.1606 of 2025) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/