HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5683 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1. 2. In light of the proposed order, notice to private respondent no.3 is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Tehsildar, Tehsil Rudauli, District Ayodhya to decide the Computerized Case No.T202504230700818, "Siddharth Rai vs. Vijay Shankar", under Section 34 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, with respect to property Gata No. 258/0.207 hectare situated at Village Banmau, Pargana and Tehsil Raudauli, District Ayodhya, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioners would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Tehsildar, Tehsil Rudauli, District Ayodhya considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to approach the court/ authority concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of the Computerized Case No.T202504230700818, "Siddharth Rai vs. Vijay Shankar", under Section 34 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, with respect to property Gata No. 258/0.207 hectare situated at Village Banmau, Pargana Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kuldeep, Pawan Kumar Pandey, Vittan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Siddharth Rai .....Petitioner(s) Tehsildar, Tehsil Rudauli, Ayodhya And Another .....Respondent(s) and Tehsil Raudauli, District Ayodhya, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the court/authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioners, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the court/authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 7. With above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. September 22, 2025 KR A227 No. 5683 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench