Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16591 (BOM)

MOHINI PUNJAJI PAIKRAO AND ANR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

CA/7091/2024 · 2025-03-19

Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Y G Khobragade

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

31ca7091-24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 31 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7091 OF 2024 IN WPST/19508/2023 Mohini Punjaji Paikrao And Anr VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others ... Mr. Khillare Ramdas E, Advocate for Applicant Mr. Amar V. Lavte, AGP for Respondents State CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. DATE : 19th March, 2025 ORDER: 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicants/original petitioners and the learned AGP. Other respondents have been duly served but none is present. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the application and considering the nature of dispute, the application is allowed. The order of the Registrar is quashed and set aside. The petition is directed to be registered subject to the condition that petitioners deposit cost of Rs.2000/- within two weeks and remove the office objections within that period. (Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) JPChavan 2025:BHC-AUG:8393-DB