HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11106 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri Rishabh Kapoor learned counsel for the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsels appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being decided finally. 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on 31.08.2024 his leave encashment, Group Insurance, Gratuity, Pension etc., have not been paid neither the respondents have paid Rs.18,000/- remaining salary and hence the petition. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent no.5 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. 5. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.5 then the respondent no.5 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. 6. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak Singh, Shubham Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rishabh Kapoor Fulchand Rawat .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban) Lko. Thru. Managing Director And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 7. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. September 19, 2025 A. Katiyar WRIA No. 11106 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench