Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1659 (AP)

LAM YUVARAJ v. S. SURESH KUMAR, IAS

CC/3950/2025 · 2026-04-16

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HN, J C.C.No.3950_2025 APHC010675722025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3950/2025 Between: 1. LAM YUVARAJ, S/O. KOTESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/O. 3-151, UPPALURU (P), KANKIPADU (M) KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. S SURESH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DR P SAMPATH KUMAR IAS, COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, 3,4,5, FLOORS, PRIME HICREST, VADDESWARAM VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI D K BALAJI IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM. 4. SRI SK NAZEER, COMMISSIONER, YSR TADIGADAPA MUNICIPALITY YSR TADIGADAPA, PORANKI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. SRI D BHUSHANAM, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, YSR TADIGADAPA MUNICIPALITY, PORANKI KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondents/ contemnors and punish them under Sections-10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, for willfully and deliberately violating the orders of this Hon'ble Court dt. 25.09.2025 passed W.P. 10410 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI 2. HN, J C.C.No.3950_2025 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents. 2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case. 3. Recording the same, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:17.04.2026 NKA HN, J C.C.No.3950_2025 288 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3950 of 2025 Date: 17.04.2026 NKA