DEEPTI MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/1054/2025 · 2025-09-19
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165881 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165881 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1054 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Raghvendra Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant, Shri Virendra Kumar, learned A.G.A.-I appearing on behalf of the State and Shri Rajiv Raman Srivastava, learned counsel for the complainant. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in Complaint Case No.100 of2023, under Sections 120B, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., registered at Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District- Sitapur, wherein it is alleged that the applicant has got the insurance policy of a vehicle renewed after death of the registered owner of the vehicle, in the name of deceased owner of the vehicle and falsely projecting herself to be the wife of the deceased owner of the vehicle, she had made herself his nominee. 3. In the affidavit filed in support of the anticipatory bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is an innocent woman, having no criminal history and she has been falsely been implicated in the present case. 4. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter. 5. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the nature of allegations and also that there is no allegation that the applicant has wrongfully taken any benefit and has deceived any person coupled with the fact that the applicant is a women and she has no previous criminal history, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for granting anticipatory bail to the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raghvendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Deepti Mishra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
applicant. 6. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed.
In the event of arrest/ appearance of applicant before the learned Trial Court in the aforesaid case crime, she shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of S.H.O./Court concerned on the following conditions and subject to any other conditions that may be fixed by the Trial Court : (i) that the applicant shall make himself/herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court. (iv) that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted; and (v) that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. September 19, 2025 S. Shivhare ABAIL No. 1054 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench