Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010221212025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 11067 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-9 [3483] Kedagani Suryarao and others ...Petitioners Vs. The Manager and Others ...Respondent(s) ********** Advocate for Petitioners: Mr. Inapurapu Suryanarayana Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): -
CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 29th April 2025 P C : Considering the fact that the petitioners have an equally efficacious alternate remedy before the D.R.T. and considering the ratio of the judgment rendered in the case of PHR Invent Educational Society v. UCO Bank 1, we do not find it a fit case to exercise our writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J akn
1 2024 SCC Online SC 528
HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Writ Petition No: 11067 of 2025 DATE : 29.04.2025
AKN
71