Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165879 (ALL)

RAM SAGAR YADAV @ RAM SAGAR v. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) COURT NO. 34 LKO. AND ANOTHER

A227/5716/2025 · 2025-09-22

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5716 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the State respondent has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. By means of the instant petition, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for expeditious disposal of an application under Order 39 and Rule 1 and 2 CPC in Regular Suit no. 474 of 2025. Considering the relief as prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner i.e. application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC which is pending adjudication in Regular Suit no. 474 of 2025, this Court taking note of the aforesaid is of the view that no gainful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending rather ends of justice can be met by directing the court concerned to consider and decide the pending application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC as expeditiously as possible. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. September 22, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chitresh Chandra Kaushal, Mukesh Kumar Tewari Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Ram Sagar Yadav @ Ram Sagar .....Petitioner(s) Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No. 34 Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench