Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165859 (ALL)

MALTI LAL BAJPAI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. DISABLE WELFARE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/11071/2025 · 2025-09-19

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11071 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- " 1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties to extent the past service rendered with the Central Government by the petitioner from initial appointment 14.09.1985, until the date of absorption i.e. 18.04.2010, with the State Government be computed and counted towards pension and other retiral benefits, including, pay fixation and arrears of salary as per the recommendation of the Sixth Pay Commission w.e.f. 01.01.2006, in the interest of justice. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 12.08.2025 contained in Annexure No.10 to this writ petition by a speaking and reasoned order and communicate the decision to the petitioner within a period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice. " 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that this case is completely covered by judgment rendered by Coordinate Bench of this court in the case of Sri Ram Shanker Dwivedi and Others versus State UP and Others, writ A No. 718 of 2016. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Neeraj Kumar Mishra, Girish Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Malti Lal Bajpai .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Disable Welfare Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 3 i.e. Director, Department of Disable Welfare, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided, in light of the judgment passed in the case of Sri Ram Shanker Dwivedi (Supra) in case same is applicable, within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 5. The petition stands disposed of. September 19, 2025 prabhat WRIA No. 11071 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench