APHC010220132023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3311] Monday, the Twenty Eighth Day of July two Thousand And Twenty Five Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Writ Petition No: 11732 of 2023 Between: 1. Surya Enterprises, rep. by its Proprietor, Vankayala Nagendra Srinivas, S/o Nageswara Rao, H.No.86-27-18/2, V.L.Puram, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District. ...Petitioner and 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Principal Secretary, Agricultural Department, Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati. 3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 4. Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation and Agriculture Transformation Project CADA, rep by its Project Director and Special Commissioner, CADA, Yysya Bhavan, Hanumanpet, Vijayawada - 520003. 5. The Commissioner and Director of Agriculture Department, Chuttugunta Circle, Murikipeta, Maharshi Dayanand Nagar, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh-522003. 6. The Joint Director of Agriculture Department, West Godavari District, Eluru. …Respondents 2 WP No.11732 of 2023 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Dasari S.V.V.S.V. PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: 1. G.P. for Finance & Planning 2. G.P. for Agriculture 3. G.P. for Irri & CAD (A.P) The Court made the following: 3 WP No.11732 of 2023 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing the amount for supplying the machineries / equipments to the respondent authorities by the petitioner even though admitted due of an amount of Rs.8,43,750/- (Rupees eight lakhs forty three thousand seven hundred and fifty only) is illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice, contrary to the rules and regulations and consequently direct the respondents to pay the admitted amounts of Rs.8,43,750/- (Rupees eight lakhs forty three thousand seven hundred and fifty only) with interest. 2. Ms K.Srilakshmi, learned counsel representing the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief has become infructuous as the amount had been paid. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _______________ B.S.BHANUMATHI Dt.28.07.2025 PNV