HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5679 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent no.1. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to respondents no. 2 to 6, is dispensed with. 3. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to direct the respondent no.1 to expeditiously decide the Revision No. 928/2025 (Rakesh Kumar and others Vs. Additional Commissioner Varanasi Division, Varanasi and others) filed by the opposite parties no.2 to 6 on 21.02.2025 against the order dated 19.02.2025 passed by the Additional Commissioner Varanasi Division, Varanasi in Case No. 79/2007-2008 (Malti Vs. Rajesh) within the stipulated time which is pending before the opposite party no.1 since 21.02.2025, in the interest of justice. 4. It has been submitted that the private respondents have filed a revision bearing Revision No. 928/2025 against the order dated 19.02.2025 before the respondent no.1 on 21.02.2025 and after filing the aforesaid Revision, the respondent no.1 served notice upon the private opposite parties. It has been stated that the matter is urgent and a perusal of the order sheet clearly indicates that though the case is regularly listed but it is routinely adjourned on one pretext or the other. 4. It is noticed that the instant matter relates to 2025 and the trial courts are heavily burdened with the dockets due to which large number of cases are pending before them. In the present case, no extraordinary circumstance has been indicated by the petitioner so as to interfere and pass orders for expeditious disposal of the revision which has been filed only in 2025. Accordingly, no case for interference is made out at this stage. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saurabh Yadav, Suryakant Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sury Kant Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) The Board Of Revenue U.P. Lucknow Thru .Chairman And Others .....Respondent(s) 5. However, looking to the aforesaid circumstances, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move appropriate application before the trial court within next two weeks for expediting the proceedings. In case, such an application is made, the trail court shall consider and decide the same within two weeks thereafter by a reasoned and speaking order. In case, the trial court finds that a case for urgency has been made out, it shall proceed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner expeditiously. 6. With aforesaid direction the petition stands disposed of. . September 23, 2025 Muk A227 No. 5679 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench