943 cp 366 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 366 OF 2025 IN WP/2772/2024 Krishnaji Sharadrao Patil VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai And Others … Mr. Pratap Govindrao Rodge, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A. S. Shinde, AGP for Respondent/s – State Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 … CORAM : N. B. SURYAWANSHI & SMT. VAISHALI PATIL–JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 16, 2025 O R D E R : 1. By placing the order dated 20.07.2025, thereby regularising the break in service of the petitioner, respondents have complied with the order. 2. The petitioner now claims that as per Government Resolutions dated 11.07.2019 and 05.07.2021, the petitioner is entitled for salary of the said period. 3. Learned advocate for the respondents submits that since the break in service of the petitioner is of more than one and half year, petitioner is not entitled for salary of the said period. komal kamble Page|1 2025:BHC-AUG:25488-DB 943 cp 366 2025 4. In view of the compliance of the order, contempt petition is disposed of. 5. If petitioner is aggrieved by the order, he may avail appropriate remedy. (SMT. VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, J.) (N. B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) komal kamble Page|2