RAM KUMAR MISHRA v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (J), AYODHYA DIVISION, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
/5736/2025 · 2025-09-23
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165829 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165829 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5736 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents, is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1 to decide the Revision No. 1623 of 2022 "Ganesh Dutt Mishra and others Vs. Smt. Kalika and others" filed under Section 210 of U.P. L.R. Act, pending in the court of Additional Commissioner (Judicial)- Ayodhya Division Ayodhya dated fixed as 03.10.2025, expeditiously, within stipulated period as prescribed by this Honb'le Court, as contained in Annexure No.1 tot his petition.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 is desired to make all endeavor to decide the Revision No. 1623 of 2022 "Ganesh Dutt Mishra and others Vs. Smt. Kalika and others" filed under Section 210 of U.P. L.R. Act, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravindra Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner (J), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s)
production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 23, 2025 Muk A227 No. 5736 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench