Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16582 (AP)

VASIREDDY KRISHNA PRASAD, TENALI, & 3 OTRS. v. THE STATE, REPTD. BY P.P., HYDERABAD.

CRLRC/740/2010 · 2025-03-24

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010221092010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 740/2010 Between: Vasireddy Krishna Prasad & 3 Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Rep By P P Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner(S): C G REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER: None appeared for the petitioners and respondent No.2. Heard the arguments of learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 2. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘the Cr.P.C’) against the common order dated 01.04.2010 passed in Crl.M.P.No.79 of 2010 in S.C.No.731 of 2009 on the file of the learned XI Additional District and Sessions Court, (Fast Track Court), Guntur at Tenali, in not discharging the petitioners/accused Nos.1, 2, 4 and 5. 3. As seen from the case status information of the learned trial Court, it is mentioned that the proceedings against the A1 to A5 were quashed vide order dated 06.03.2019 in Crl.P.No.1114 of 2019 by this Court. Therefore, the learned trial Court closed the case as quashed and item Nos.1 to 3 vide C.P.R.No.2 of 2010 were directed to be destroyed forthwith. 4. A perusal of the order of this Court in Crl.P.No.1114 of 2019 dated 06.03.2019 shows that the Criminal Petition was allowed and the further proceedings against the petitioners who are A1 to A5 in S.C.No.731 of 2009 on the file of the learned XI Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) Guntur at Tenali, were quashed. 5. In view of the above order, the Criminal Revision Case has become infructuous and it is liable to be dismissed. 6. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. ________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dated: 24.03.2025 M K K