SMT. VANDANA RAI v. SMT. BINDU BALA SHARMA AND 2 OTHERS
A227/5701/2025 · 2025-09-22
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165813 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165813 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5701 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the suit for objection R.S. No.2104 of 2021. Considering the aforesaid as well as from a perusal of the extracts of order sheet, this Court does not find that there are any accentuating circumstances for this Court to expedite the proceedings. Accordingly, liberty shall be available for the petitioner to move an appropriate application before the court concerned. Needless to say that such an application is moved before the court concerned, the court concerned shall pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. With the aforesaid the petition is dismissed. It is made clear that mere dismissal of the petition may not come in the way of the petitioner, in case, if any cause for expedition arises in future relating to the year, 2021. September 22, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar Tiwari, Km. Niharika Mishra, Verender Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Jaspreet Singh,J.) Smt. Vandana Rai .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Bindu Bala Sharma And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench