VIKAS KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDU. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/11000/2025 · 2025-09-18
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165812 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165812 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11000 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to implead the Secretary Basic Education Board, Prayagraj, as respondent no.5 during the course of the day.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondents no.1 and 2, Sri Kumar Ayush, learned counsel for respondents no.3 and 4, and Sri Gaurav Joshi holding brief of Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel, who has put in appearance and has accepted notice for respondent no.5.
3. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally.
4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite a transfer order dated 08.08.2025 having been passed whereby the petitioner has been transferred from one institution to other in District Bahraich he is not being relieved.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.5 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels appearing for respondents have no objection. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravindra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kumar Ayush Vikas Kumar Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Edu. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within a week from today before respondent no.5 then respondent no.5 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of four weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order.
7. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off.
8. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. September 18, 2025 A. Katiyar WRIA No. 11000 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench