Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165803 (ALL)

VINOD KUMAR GAUTAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. (PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPTT.) LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/10971/2025 · 2025-09-18

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10971 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayer:- "A- A writ or writs, direction or directions, order and order's in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to pay the entire leave encashment of the petitioner along with interest @ 12 P.A. from the date of his superannuation and till the date of actual payment and also pay compensation Rs. 1 lacs for his harassment, within stipulated time which this Hon'ble court deem fit and proper." 3. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 3 i.e. District Panchayat Raj Officer, District Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 4. The petition stands disposed of. September 18, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Vinod Kumar Gautam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Panchayat Raj Deptt.) Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench