Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165800 (ALL)

SUMAN YADAV AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P.THRU. PRIN. SECY. SECONDARY EDUCATION GOVT. OF U.P. LKO.AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/11029/2025 · 2025-09-18

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11029 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State counsel for opposite parties. 2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main reliefs:- "i. Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to consider the promotion of the petitioners on the Post of Gazetted Officer in the concerned Department as per their respective seniority in light of order dated 11.05.2024, annexed as annexure no.9, within stipulated time period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. ii. Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to consider the promotion of the petitioners on the Post of Gazetted Officer in the concerned Department as per their respective seniority in pursuance of the Order Government Order No.18/10/2008 dk-2- 2008 dated 03.02.2008 amendment Government Order No.7/18/1/2008/dk- 2/2015 dated 28.07.2015 with all consequential benefits, within stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. iii. Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to decide the representation of petitioners dated 28.08.2025, annexed as annexure no.10, within stipulated time period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Umesh Chandra Tripathi, Abhinav Bhattacharya, Shambhunath Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Suman Yadav And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Education Govt. Of U.P. Lko.And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 3. Learned counsel for petitioners has drawn attention to the letter dated 04.09.2025 whereby proceedings for promotion on the next higher post of Principal has been initiated. 4. Since consideration of petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty are granted to petitioners to file fresh individual representations before opposite party No. 2 i.e. Director (Secondary Education), U.P. at Lucknow. In case such representations are filed, the same shall be decided within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 18, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 11029 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench