KALAVATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
WRIC/9235/2025 · 2025-09-26
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165792 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165792 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9235 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Shri Vivek Kumar Tripathi, learned Counsel for the petitioner at the very outset submits that he does not want to press this writ petition because the petitioner has efficacious remedy of filing revision against the impugned order dated 30.8.2025, passed by Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow.
2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.
3. Office is directed to return the certified copies of the impugned orders to the learned counsel for the petitioner, after retaining the photo stat copies of the same. September 26, 2025 Muk Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vivek Kumar Tripathi, Sudhir Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Alok Mathur,J.) Kalavati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench