SALAUDDIN @ MANSURI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND 4 OTHERS
BAIL/11087/2024 · 2025-03-18
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165783 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165783 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:15771 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11087 of 2024 Applicant :- Salauddin @ Mansuri Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Verma,Akhilendra Pratap Singh,Himanshu Tiwari,Vinod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Mohd. Aamin, the maternal uncle of the applicant and who has filed the affidavit in support of the bail application and Sri Ravi Srivastava, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 414 of 2024, under Sections 64/127 (2) BNS (Earlier Sections 376/342 I.P.C.) and Section 3/4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, registered at Police Station Para, District Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 04.08.2024 alleging that an unknown AC mechanic molested the informant's daughter aged about 17 years inside her house in her absence. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. The victim supported the F.I.R. allegations in her statement but no sign of physical violence was seen on her body during her medical examination. 5. The State has filed a counter affidavit annexing therewith
copies of material collected during investigation and copy of charge sheet dated 02.10.2024. 6. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the applicant annexing therewith copies of statements of prosecutrix and the informant recorded by the learned trial court, both of them have been declared hostile. 7. As the informant and the victim have not supported the prosecution case in their statements recorded by learned trial court and they have been turned hostile coupled with the fact that the applicant has no previous criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 06.08.2024 and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9.
Let the applicant-Salauddin @ Mansuri be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 18.3.2025 Ram. Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench