HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5743 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel on behalf of State - respondent no.1. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to respondents no. 2 to 7, is dispensed with. 3. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to direct the respondent no.1 i.e. Deputy Director of Consolidation Gonda, District Gonda to decide the Review Application dated 21.06.2019 in Case No. 286 of 2019 under Section 48(1) of Consolidation of Holdings Act of Ram Lakhan Vs. Munna Ram and others in Re: Revision No.904/594 under Section 48 Ram Lkhan Vs. Rajmani (which was decided on 12.01.2004) pending since 21.06.2019, within stipulated time, as early as possible, in the interest of justice. 4. It has been submitted that the petitioner has filed a review application before the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Gonda, District Gonda, on 21.06.2019. The review application was admitted, notices were issued, and review number was generated bearing its No. 286 Ram Lakhan Vs. Munna Ram and others, who is legal heir of Rajmani. It has been stated that the matter is urgent and a perusal of the order sheet clearly indicates that though the case is regularly listed but it is routinely adjourned on one pretext or the other. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Dubey, Jitendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Lakhan @ Ram Lakhan Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Gonda And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. It is noticed that the instant matter relates to 2019 and the trial courts are heavily burdened with the dockets due to which large number of cases are pending before them. In the present case, no extraordinary circumstance has been indicated by the petitioner so as to interfere and pass orders for expeditious disposal of the review application which has been filed only in 2019. Accordingly, no case for interference is made out at this stage. 6. However, looking to the aforesaid circumstances, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move appropriate application before the trial court within next two weeks for expediting the proceedings. In case, such an application is made, the trail court shall consider and decide the same within two weeks thereafter by a reasoned and speaking order. In case, the trial court finds that a case for urgency has been made out, it shall proceed to consider and decide the review application of the petitioner expeditiously. 7. With aforesaid direction the petition stands disposed of. September 23, 2025 Muk A227 No. 5743 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench