HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7972 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Sri Vineet Kumar Verma, learned Advocates has filed their Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned Counsel for the opposite party no.2, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The instant application has been filed for the following main relief:- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that thisHon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.18745 of 2017; State versus Abhishek Singh and others, arising out of Case Crime No. 0189 of 2016, Under Section-498-A, 323, 506 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act at Police Station Mall, District-Lucknow, pending in the Court of Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate IV, Court No. 28, Lucknow, as well as impugned summoning order dated 05-06- 2017 and Charge sheet No. 01 of 2017, Dated 27-04-2017, under section - 323, 506, 498-A IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act against the petitioners filed by investigating officer in the aforesaid case crime number, in the interest of law and justice." Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this regard, the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Niteesh Kumar, Rajeev Narayan Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Abhishek Singh And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And Another .....Opposite Party(s) proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Trial Court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Considering the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of finally in following terms:- (i) The parties to the proceedings i.e. Criminal Case No.18745 of 2017 (supra), shall appear before the concerned Court within six weeks from today and file the compromise. (ii) If the parties appear before the concerned Court in terms of above, the concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record. (iii) The concerned Court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within two weeks' from the date of production of copy of this order. (iv) The concerned Court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed. (v) It shall be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. (vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise, if any, to the Counsel for the applicants, after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned court. (vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. September 18, 2025 Jyoti/- A482 No. 7972 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench