HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11189 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Krishan Vishwakarma holding brief of Shri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for the respondents. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. Grievance of the petitioner is that the remaining gratuity as payable to the petitioner should be released and paid as per the recommendation of the 6th Pay Commission along with admissible interest. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent no.2 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.2 then the respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak Singh, Shivam Dixit, Shubham Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rishabh Kapoor Nirmala Singh .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Jal Nigam (Rural) 6, Rana Pratap Marg Lko. Thru. Managing Director And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) forth by the petitioner. September 22, 2025 prateek WRIA No. 11189 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench