RAHUL VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/9054/2025 · 2025-09-24
Subhash Vidyarthi
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165737 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165737 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9054 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Sachin Verma, the learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Satyendra Srivastava, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.164 of 2025 under Sections 137(2), 87 of B.N.S. and Section 7/8 of P.O.C.S.O. Act registered at Police Station- Jagatpur, District- Raebareli. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. alleging that the informant's daughter was talking to the applicant for the past three months and, thereafter, the applicant enticed her away with the assistance of his father. 4. In the statement of the victim recorded under Section 180 B.N.S.S., she stated that her mother was trying to get her married to some other person and she had asked the applicant to take her with him. She stated that no misdeed was committed against her. 5. The victim declined to undergo medico-legal examination. 6. In the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 B.N.S.S., she reiterated her earlier version and further stated that her mother had turned her out of her home. She stated that she will live with the applicant else she will consume poison and commit suicide. 7. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is a young man aged 21 years having no criminal history and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 8. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application and he has submitted that the allegations have been established during investigation and a charge-sheet Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sachin Verma, Praveen Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rahul Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
has been submitted on 24.08.2025. 9.
Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the aforesaid statements of the victim wherein she has not levelled any allegation against the applicant coupled with the fact that the applicant is a young man aged 21 years having no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 12.08.2025 whereas the investigation already stands concluded, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 10. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 11. Let the applicant- Rahul Verma be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court, unless his/her appearance exempted by the trial Court. September 24, 2025 -Amit K- BAIL No. 9054 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench