RAM GULAM YADAV v. COMMISSIONER LKO. DIV. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/9229/2025 · 2025-09-18
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165732 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165732 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9229 of 2025
Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Shri Vikram Soni, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Ajay Kumar Singh Tomar, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 & 3.
2. Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 08.09.2025 passed by the Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner against an order of demolition has been dismissed.
3. Learned counsel for respondent nos.2 & 3 states that a revision is prescribed under Section 41 of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973.
4. The same assertion is made by learned Standing Counsel for the State.
5. Upholding the said objection, present petition is disposed off relegating the petitioner to prefer a revision under Section 41(3) of the Act within a period of two weeks from today which shall be decided with all expedition.
6. In case the revision is preferred within a period of two weeks from Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ratnesh Chandra Ram Gulam Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Commissioner Lko. Div. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
today, no action for demolition shall take place till the disposal of the revision. September 18, 2025 nishant WRIC No. 9229 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench