Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10160 WP No. 4311 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 4311 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
FATHIMA JAZEELA D/O HUSSAINAR B.S., AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS R/O 1-305 JANATHA COLONY MOODU GOPAADY GOPADI KOTESHWARA UDUPI - 576 222.
2.
NIDA BANU SHAIK H., D/O HIDAYATHULLA AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS R/O 2-185, ROSHAN MANZIL THOKKATTO UDUPI - 576 231.
3. ZUHA D/O ZUBAIR YUSUF AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS R/O 2-335, A.R MANZIL BAZAAR ROAD BEHIND BOMBAY BAKERY SHIROOR, UDUPI - 576 228.
4.
FATHIMA SANA D/O MOHAMMED AYUB AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/O 63/2,
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10160 WP No. 4311 of 2022
BALLI SAHEB HOUSE KOLNESHWARA UDUPI - 576 222. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI SIRAJUDDIN AHMED, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU – 560 001.
2.
THE BHANDARKAR’S ARTS AND SCIENCE COLLEGE VODERAHOBLI, KUNDAPURA UDUPI DIST – 576 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R-1)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R2 NOT TO INTERFERE WITH THE PETITIONERS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT OF THEIR RELIGION TO WEAR HEAD SCARF IN THE COLLEGE/CLASSROOMS WITHOUT FURTHER DELAY; DECLARE THAT WEARING HEAD SCARF IS THE RIGHT COMES UNDER RIGHT TO PRACTICE RELIGION OF CHOICE AND RESTRAINING FROM ATTENDING THE COLLEGE IS VIOLATION OF RIGHT TO EDUCATION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10160 WP No. 4311 of 2022
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
2. The memo reads as follows:
“MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The undersigned Counsel for the petitioner most respectfully submit this memo for withdrawal. This Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to permit the counsel to withdraw the petition in the interest of justice. Wherefore it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to consider the memo in the interest of Justice.”
In terms of the memo, the writ petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA)
JUDGE
NVJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 399