Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165729 (ALL)

KUWARE @ RAM KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/9024/2025 · 2025-09-26

Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9024 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard Mr. Mulayam Singh Yadav, learned counsel for petitioner, Shri Girijesh Dwivedi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. 2. By means of the present petition, the petitioner has sought following relief:- "i). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the first information report dated 04.06.2022 registered as F.I.R. No. 0210/2022, under Sections 3 (1) of the U.P. Gangster Act, 1986 at Police Station Safdarganj, District Barabanki a well as quash the gang chart no. 69/J.A, Gang Chart dated 03.06.2022, contained as Annexure No. 1 and 2 to the writ petition. ii). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 1 and 3 not to arrest the petitioner in F.I.R. No. 0210/2022, under Section 3 (1) of the U.P. Gangster Act, 1986 at Police Station Safdarganj, District Barabanki as contained in Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition." 3. Shri Girijesh Dwivedi, learned A.G.A. for the State has produced copy Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mulayam Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Kuware @ Ram Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) of the instruction/letter provided by Mr. Sudhir Kumar Singh, Inspector In-charge, Police Station Safdarganj, District Barabanki showing the supplementary gang chart wherein a decision has been taken by District Magistrate and Superintendent of Police, Barabanki on the joint meeting to impose Gangster Act upon the petitioner considering his criminal conduct. 4. The relevant extract of the aforesaid information has been provided to learned counsel for petitioner. 5. In the wake of aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present writ petition, therefore, the same is consigned to record. 6. However, it is always open for the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy before the appropriate court of law/authority strictly in accordance with law. September 26, 2025 Virendra CRLP No. 9024 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench