ANKIT JAISAWAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/8891/2025 · 2025-09-26
Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165728 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165728 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8891 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard Shri Mandhata Samrat, Advocate holding brief of Smt. Shikha Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing at some length, submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail remedy of anticipatory bail /bail.
3. To which there is no objection by learned AGA for the State.
4. In view of above, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. September 26, 2025 Raj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Smt. Shikha Srivastava, Abhinav Pankaj, Priyank Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Ankit Jaisawal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench