Patchipala Namrata, v. The Commissioner of Police,
WP/14435/2020 · 2025-09-07
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16571 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16571 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010219512020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14435/2020 Between:
1. PATCHIPALA NAMRATA,, D/O RANGA RAO, HINDU, AGED 50 YEARS,D. NO. 3A, RAMA PRIDE APARTMENTS, GURUNANAK COLONY, MAIN ROAD, VIJAYAMAIDA.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM, AP
2. THE S H O, MAHARANIPETA POLICE STATION,VISAKHAPATNAM.
3. THE S H O, MUVVALAVANI PALYAM POLICE STATION,VISAKHAPATNAM.
4. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, AP, AT MANGATAGIRI, GUNTUIR DIST
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G SEENA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2.
2
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14435 of 2020 ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 1st respondents in not clubbing the FIR.No.299/2020, 301/2020 and FIR.No.506/2020 on the file 2nd and 3rd respondent police stations or any other crimes which are going to be registered in other Police station if any respectively and file comprehensive charge sheet if there is any evidence for the different complaints on the similar allegation and offences as illegal, improper, unjust and arbitrary and contrary to law and further direct the respondents to club all the FIRs against the petitioner for the same offences and file comprehensive charge sheet as held by the Honourable Apex court and pass.…”
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance.
4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.09.2025. UPS
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.14435 of 2020
Dated.08.09.2025
UPS
132