HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5650 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard Sri Kartikey Dubey, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. By means of this writ petition, prayer has been made for directing respondent No.1 i.e. the State to decide the Revision Appeal no.123/77-4- 2024 said to have been preferred by the petitioner expeditiously. Having regard to the innocuous nature of prayer made in this petition, the writ petition is disposed off with the consent of parties with direction to respondent No.1 to decide the revision petition preferred by the petitioner within eight weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order in accordance with law. It is also provided that the application seeking grant of interim relief moved by the petitioner shall also be decided within a period of three weeks from today, and till the decision of the application for interim relief, no coercive action shall be taken by the respondents. It is made clear that on passing of appropriate orders in the revision as directed above, the protection granted by this Court shall cease to operate. September 19, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kartikey Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sachin Upadhyay (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Prakash Academy India Private Limited Thru. Authorized Signatory Ajay Kansal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Infrastructure And Industrial Dev. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench