Smt. Aradhana Verma v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LUCKNOW AND 2 OTHERS
TACL/221/2024 · 2025-07-23
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165702 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165702 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42330 Court No. - 7 Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 221 of 2024 Applicant :- Smt. Aradhana Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Anupesh Kumar,Vijay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. The office report indicates that unserved envelope has been received back with remark "unclaimed RTS".
2. It is clear that the respondent is avoiding the service.
3. Considering the allegations contained and the inconvenience being faced by the applicant-wife, the present application is allowed. The proceedings of Matrimonial Case No.356 of 2024 (Jitendra Verma vs Aradhana Verma) pending in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Barabanki are transferred to the equivalent court at District Gonda. Order Date :- 23.7.2025 akverma Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench