Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16569 (MAD)

NATARAJAN v. THE STATE REP BY ITS

CRL OP/3468/2025 · 2025-02-10

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.3468 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.02.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.3468 of 2025 1. Natarajan 2. Thamayanthi 3. Sakthivel ... Petitioners Vs 1. The State Rep.By, District Superintendent of Police, Office of District Superintendent of Police, Ariyalur-621 704. 2. The State, rep. by The Inspector of Police, Irumbulikurichi, Ariyalur District-621714. 3. Manimegalai 4. Revathi 5. Gomathi 6. Rani 7. Ilamathi 8. Arumugam 9. Veeramani 10. Ramesh 11. Kumar ... Respondents https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.3468 of 2025 PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the Respondent 1 and 2 herein to give police protection to the life and limb of the petitioners by considering the representation dated 10.09.2024. For Petitioners : M/s D.Kamatchi For R1 and R2 : Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Crl.side) ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed for direction directing the Respondent 1 and 2 herein to give police protection to the life and limb of the petitioners by considering the representation dated 10.09.2024. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondents 1 and 2 and perused the materials placed on record. 3. The petitioners are in custody of cash to the tune of more than Rs.40 Lakhs. The third respondent is the second wife of the first petitioner. According to the first petitioner, though he had provided all facilities and seedhana articles during the marriage of his children, now they have an eye on the cash possessed by the first petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.3468 of 2025 4. The respondents 3 to 11 engaged in illegal activities and also attacked the first petitioner, causing him to sustained injury. So far, two cases have been registered as against the respondents 3 to 11, one in Crime No.4 of 2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(1) of IPC and another in Crime No.76 of 2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 323 of IPC and Section 4 of TN Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002. 5. After completion of investigation in Crime No.4 of 2023, the final report has been filed and the same has been taken cognizance in C.C.No.44 of 2023, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ariyalur and it is pending for trial. Even thereafter, the respondents 3 to 11 attempted to attack the petitioner, since the petitioner is in possession of a sum of Rs.40 Lakhs. Though the petitioner lodged a complaint, the second respondent did not take any action as against the respondents 3 to 11 herein. 6. In view of the above, the second respondent is directed to conduct detailed enquiry on the subsequent complaint lodged by the petitioner as against the respondents 3 to 11 herein and take appropriate action against them in the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.3468 of 2025 manner known to law. 7. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. 10.02.2025 Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order mn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.3468 of 2025 To 1. The District Superintendent of Police, Office of District Superintendent of Police, Ariyalur-621 704. 2. The Inspector of Police, Irumbulikurichi, Ariyalur District-621714. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.3468 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, mn Crl.O.P.No.3468 of 2025 10.02.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis