SUBHASH BHARGAVA AND OTHERS v. AMARJEET KUMAR SHARMA
COPC/772/2025 · 2025-07-29
Ajay Mohan Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16569 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16569 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No.772 of 2025
Decided on: 29.07.2025
Subhash Bhargava and others
… Petitioners
Versus
Dr. Amarjeet Kumar Sharma
… Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioners : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional
Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Learned Additional Advocate General submits that appropriate orders in terms of the judgment in issue shall positively be passed by the Authority concerned within a period of three weeks from today. His statement is taken on record.
2.
These proceedings are accordingly closed, with liberty to the petitioners to seek the revival thereof, if the needful is not done within a period of three weeks from today by the Authority concerned. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge July 29, 2025 (Vinod)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?