KRISHNA DUTT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/5612/2025 · 2025-09-22
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165678 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165678 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5612 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no.1 to 4.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondent no.6 is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 4 / Tehsildar/Tehsildar (Judicial) Tehsil Sadar, District Unnao to decide the Case No.10924 of 2022 "Gram Sabha vs. Saryu", under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 4 / Tehsildar/Tehsildar (Judicial) Tehsil Sadar, District Unnao, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 4 / Tehsildar/Tehsildar (Judicial) Tehsil Sadar, District Unnao is directed to decide Case No.10924 of 2022 "Gram Sabha vs. Saryu", under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avinash Tiwari, Atul Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Krishna Dutt .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 22, 2025 KR A227 No. 5612 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench