MO. NAEEM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/7973/2025 · 2025-09-22
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165664 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165664 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7973 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to opposite party no. 2 is hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant application under section 482 CrPC has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.1217/2013 (State Vs. Mohd. Naeem), arising out of Crime No.440/1991, under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 336 IPC lodged at Police Station Hasanganj, District Lucknow, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate- I, Lucknow, including the charge-sheet dated 13.12.1991 and the order dated 25.07.2025 by means of which non-bailable warrants have bee issued against the applicant. 4. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that due to unavoidable circumstances the applicant could not appear before the trial court and he undertakes that he will remain present on each & every date fixed by the trial court and would never abscond from proceeding of the trial. 5. Learned counsel for the State has no objection. 6. Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, it is apparent that the applicant did not appear before the trial court and non- bailable warrants have been issued against him for procuring his presence to complete the proceedings of the trial smoothly. An undertaking has been given by the applicant that he will appear on the next date fixed by the trial Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vineet Kumar Pandey, Pradeep Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mo. Naeem .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
court and will keep on appearing on each & every date fixed by the trial court. 7. In view of aforesaid, the impugned order of issuing non-bailable warrants dated 25.07.2025 is directed to be kept in abeyance. The applicant is directed to appear before the trial court on the next date fixed and keep on appearing on each & every date fixed by the trial court and if he feels unable to appear, he will move an application in writing with cogent reason(s), failing which the trial court shall proceed against him in accordance with law. 8.
With the aforesaid observations/directions, the application stands disposed of. . (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) September 22, 2025 MVS/- A482 No. 7973 of 2025 2
Digitally signed by :- MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench